Newt Gingrich, a US Senator,
made waves in des. 2011, when he referred to the Palestinians as an
“invented” people.
“Remember,
there was no Palestine as a state. It was part of the Ottoman Empire. We have
invented the Palestinian people, who are in fact Arabs and are historically
part of the Arab people, and they had the chance to go many places,” said Newt
Gingrich in an interview with the Jewish Channel.
The
remarks drew broad criticism from the left and the right.
Negotiator for the
Palestinian Authority (PA), Saeb Erekat, responded by saying this is "the
most racist remark I've ever heard."
PA Prime Minister
Salam Fayyad described Gingrich comments as "a totally unacceptable
distortion of historical truth”
Republican presidential candidate in 2011 Newt
Gingrich, came under fire for saying that
Palestinians are an “invented” people.
Gingrich, who has a doctorate in modern European
history, did not draw the statement: "What I said is historically
true"
And Daniel Pipes, who
is an American historian, writer, and political commentator, insists Gingrich
was right in what he said.
Gingrich's comments have touched some sensitive points,
not only
among the Palestinian Arabs, but also in political circles in Western countries
where the alleged existence of a Palestinian people serves as the basis to
support a two-state solution. This is why the topic received so much media
coverage afterwards.
The two-state solution is built on an acceptance of the claim that there is
a Palestinian people who have been robbed of their land, nation and holy
places.
If there never was such a nation, in the past two
millennia; never was a
Palestinian capital in Jerusalem; has never been a Palestinian king, or sultan;
Never found a distinct Palestinian culture; Never a specifically Palestinian
territory; never any Palestinian national poets and never a bright Palestinian history,
than the legitimacy of the "Palestinian
cause" is severely damaged.
And the
answer is that a people and a nation is a combination of all the cases
mentioned above.
The history of the ancient Philistines.
The ancient
Palestinian history, you will find mainly in the Bible.
There you
can read a lot about the Philistines in the time of King Saul and King David.
The
Philistines originally had its history from Crete. The Old Testament indicates
that around the 14th century B.C. during the days of Joshua, they lived on the
coast of Canaan. There, they built their five cities: Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod,
Gath, and Ekron (Joshua 13:3).
and they disappeared from history in the 6th century
BC, at the
time when the Babylonians invaded
Judah
Jewish history in the same area?
According to
history, the Jews have been in the area a lot longer.
There are
historical evidence of King David's kingdom three thousand years ago, as the
Tel Dan inscription, or “House of David” inscription.
In "The Jewish War" the author Flavius Josephus (AD 37 -93) describes the
destruction of the temple in Jerusalem by the Romans in 70 AD.
The Menorah, carried in a Roman triumph after the 70 CE Siege of Jerusalem (original relieffrom the Arch of Titus, Rome).
Later, the Jewish leader
Bar Kokhba started a revolt against the Roman Empire in 132 CE, establishing an
independent Jewish state. His state was conquered by the Romans in 135
Following a two and half-year war. And the Roman Emperor Hadrian cursed the Jewish People and decreed that Judea should be
henceforth called "Palestine" after the Philistines, an ancient enemy
of Israel that had disappeared from the world's stage more than 700 years
earlier. This was Rome final showdown with the Jewish people, after wars,
massacres, persecutions, and exiles that had largely extinguished the Jewish
presence from Judea.
The Palestinian people disappeared from the history
many centuries earlier than the Jews, and
the ancient Palestinians have no connection to the Palestinian Arabs today.
Especially among the Bedouins there are many who have
Jewish roots and Jewish genes.
The Jewish
people base their claim to the land of Israel on at least two premises:
1) the Jewish people settled and developed the land in
ancient time,
The Jews are actually indigenous to this area and have
every right to be there through the UN charter for indigenous rights, far more
than the Palestinian Arabs.
2) The international community granted political
sovereignty in Palestine to the Jewish people in 1922.
The establishment of Israel as a state.
Israel has a
strong foundation in international law.
But among Western
politicians and media to day, there is much ignorance.
The
foundation of the state of Israel was formed after World War I.
The peace
process after the World War I, and the British takeover of Ottoman land, in the
Middle East, was administered by the League of Nations.
It all
started with the Paris Peace Conference in 1919.
San Remo
conference the following year.
The peace
process ended with The Treaty of Lausanne in 1924.
The San Remo Conference in 1920.
There came
the great powers who won the World War I, together to
continue the
work they started in Paris the year before, to create a new Europe.
Three great
empires had vanished, the Habsburg Empire, the Ottoman Empire and Germany.
And the map
of Europe was to be drawn up again, new nation-states arose.
This kind of
national thinking was also expressed when it came to the Ottoman Middle East. In
San Remo the Jewish people's historical roots came on the table, the Jewish
connection to Jerusalem and this land area in the Middle East,
and the San
Remo Conference approved the Balfour declaration of a Jewish national home in Palestine.
In San Remo 1920, the Jews were recognized as a people with historical
rights in Palestine.
The peace
conference reconstituted (restored)
the Jewish
national home, based on historical facts.
In 1922, the League of Nations approved what was done
in San Remo, and gave
the mandatory authority to the UK for the geographical area of Palestine.
And in this
mandate was established, that Britain would give the land such political,
administrative and economic conditions that would ensure the establishment of a
Jewish national home.
It should
also be organized for Jewish immigration.
The UN Charter Article 80, states that all the League of Nations
agreements
for land and people, can not be broken.
But to day,
the UN, and the international community tries to create a Palestinian state in this
aria (the West Bank and Gaza), in conflict with the San Remo conference, and the
League of Nations .
In the
international community today, The
partition plan for Palestine in 1947,
is
considered as the foundation of the state of Israel?
With the UN
Resolution 181 in 1947, this area that the Jews had received in 1922, was
divided once again, in violation to the League of Nations mandate, and also in
violation with UN Charter Article 80, who said that previously agreed
international legal agreements
to land and
people, could not be broken.
But what about the Arabs, and their connection to this land?
In 1922, when Churchill was British
minister for the colonies, he gave 3/4 of the Palestinian Mandate to the Arabs,
so the Arabs really got their share of the Palestine Mandate.
According to
the San Remo conference, the Jews could settle in the entire Palestine Mandate.
But
Churchill changed this, and divided the mandate between Arabs and Jews, where
Jews could only settle west of the Jordan River.
But Arabs
from Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt immigrated to the Jewish
part of the British Mandate in the 20s and 30s, which was granted the Jews.
The reason
for this was that the Jews and the British, created employment by industry and
agricultural colonies.
There are
clear evidence of this emigration, in newspapers and books that were written in
the Palestine Mandate period, and also The British Hope-Simpson commission of
1930, proposed to limit the Arab Immigration into this area.
The Faisal – Weizmann Agreement. Arab-Jewish cooperation.
Emir Feisal
from Mecca, (son of the King of Hejaz)
attended the peace conference in
Paris in 1919, as the Arab representative, and Chaim Weizmann (later President of the World
Zionist Organization) as the Jewish representative.
They came
together before the Peace Conference in Paris January 1919, and signed an
agreement, about Arab-Jewish cooperation on the establishment of a Jewish and
an Arab nation (Faisal-Weizmann Agreement)
They
presented their case and received support from the Peace Conference.
But the
Arabs did not get the major Arab state they wanted, the area was divided into Mesopotamia,
Lebanon and Syria. And they got Jordan from the British.
All Arab states are inventions of the last century; inventions made by the European colonial powers. It was for example no Jordanians in the eighteenth century. Under the British Mandate, all citizens of the Mandate territory of both Jews and Arabs, were called "Palestinians." So if the Palestinians, as we know them today existed at the time, how could the British use this terminology for both groups?
In the British mandate period, as mentioned above, all the inhabitants of the British
Palestine Mandate were called Palestinians, and the Arabs in the area were
strongly opposed to the concept. It was seen as an European colonial
power-invention.
Similarly, why did the UN Partition Plan of 1947
called for the establishment of a Jewish and an Arab state, It should have been
called "the Jewish and the Palestinian State"? The answer
is obvious, there were no Palestinians - There were Arabs. The Arabs of the
British Palestine Mandate was not considered a separate entity, as a distinct
people, but as part of the Arab people.
Today, the
Arabs have 21 states and the Jews one.
Today we know that England and France did not follow
up the
mandated responsibility they had been given by the League of Nations.
They acted
as colonizers, and took little account that they managed a mandate with clear
commitments and promises.
What upset
the Arabs was the division of the Middle East by Britain and France (The Sykes-Picot Agreement)
The British also laid limitation on Jewish immigration
to Palestine, which
was contrary to the League of Nations provisions of the Palestine mandate. (The White Paper of 1939)
When Hitler
came to power, many Jews were unable to get in to Palestine, because of
these limitation. (European countries
did not let the Jews into their own countries) and many Jews ended up in
Hitler's concentration camps because of British restrictions.
Jewish demonstration against White Paper in Jerusalem, 1939
The League of Nation had no major sanctions over
Britain and France's violation of the mandate rules.
At that time
as today, power reigns.
But
Jews and Arabs got their historical rights from the League of Nations, with
clear borders of the British and French mandated documents.
Some facts about the situation in
Palestine and the Arab world, before the British took over The Palestine mandate, after the World
War I.
In Ottoman times, 80-90% of the Arab
people were illiterate.
Before 1900 there was only one
newspaper in the Arab world, which was produced in Paris and was released in
Beirut.
The part of the population who
could read and write were wealthy families who lived in Beirut, Damascus,
Baghdad, Jerusalem and Cairo.
The dominant families in Jerusalem,
was the Husayni and Nashashibi families, and some few
families more.
These families sent their sons to
school in England and France.
Another influential family were the
Hadi family in Nablus.
These families became politically
active after the World War I.
According to people who traveled the
country in Ottoman times, the rest of the people were Bedouins and poor
villagers.
Mark Tvain traveled through
Palestine in 1867, and experienced a sparsely populated country, with
impoverished villagers and much disease. One can read about his journey in the
book "The Innocents Abroad" that can be read on the internet.
In addition to Mark Twain, there are
many travelers who gives a similar description of the country, as Samuel
Manning who traveled the country in 1874 and Colonel CR Conder who traveled
through Palestine in 1872 and in 1880.
Throughout the Ottoman period of 400 years there were Jewish immigration
into the Jews' ancient homeland.
When the Jews were expelled from
Spain in 1492. The Jews were well received by the Ottoman sultan of Turkey, and
later on they went to Jerusalem, Safed, Hebron and Tiberias, that become Jewish
towns in the Ottoman period.
From 1881 a large number
of Jewish refugees from Eastern Europe settled in Palestine, one aliyah after the other with
Jewish immigrants until WW I.
The Ottoman Empire was a Muslim
kingdom, with many different peoples and religions, and Jews became numerous in
the area, especially the Jewish population in Jerusalem, but long before this
immigration of Jews from Eastern Europe began in 1882, the Jews in Jerusalem were
the largest ethnic group.
And the question is whether it has ever existed a Palestinian Jerusalem?
It must then be under Emperor
Hadrian in the first century AD. He called the land of the Jews'
"Palestine" but it didn't last long. When Caliph Umar conquered
Jerusalem in 637, he called it "the land of the Jews"
The area has for 2000 years never
been a separate country with Jerusalem as its capital.
In 1948 there were
100,000 Jews living in Jerusalem, many in the Jewish Quarter of the Old City
and east Jerusalem, and 60,000 Arabs were living there at that time. Jerusalem
has not at any time been a Palestinian city, and the last two hundred years,
neither a city with Arabic Majority.
The British mandate
period.
When it comes to the British mandate period, there is a
lot of myths about how Jews and the British collaborated,
to suppress the Arabs in the area. Often the exact opposite happened,
especially in the 30s, where the British laid major restrictions on the Jews.
In 1919, some members of these wealthy families in Jerusalem, led by Haj
Amin al-Husseini attended the Pan-Syrian Congress held in Damascus, where they
supported Emir Faisal from Mecca, as King of Syria.
The idea then, was not
a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital, but an Arab state, with
Damascus as its capital.
From being Ottoman
land without borders, the area was divided
between England and France after World War I. The French and British mandates
in
the Middle East, became four independent Arab states in the 1940s.
But a Jewish state in this area, was for political reasons out of the
question for the British government at the time, because of Arab resistance.
In 1917 the Balfour Declaration gave the Jews the right to a national
home in Palestine, as mentioned before, and in 1922 the Balfour Declaration was
approved by the League of Nations.
And this Jewish national home on the west side of the Jordan River had its
own flag in the British mandate period.
But among these Arab upper class families, Jews and Christians were
considered Dimmies, second-class people,
so this idea of a Jewish state in
this Muslim area, was never accepted by the leading Arab
families in Palestine and the Arab world.
In particular the idea met strong resistance from The Grand Mufti of
Jerusalem Haj Amin al-Husaini, who later collaborated with Hitler during WW II
Much of the unrest and revolt that occurred in Palestine in the years
from1920
to 1940, was caused by The Grand Mufti.
In 1937 the Peel Commission of
Inquiry set out to propose changes to the British Mandate for Palestine following
the outbreak of the 1936-1939 Arab revolt in Palestine.
One of the grievances from some of the wealthy families in Jerusalem to the Peel Commission, was that the Jews acquired Palestinian Arab land.
Funny enough, it was this Arab landowners families in Jerusalem who sold land to the Jewish National Fund.
One of the grievances from some of the wealthy families in Jerusalem to the Peel Commission, was that the Jews acquired Palestinian Arab land.
Funny enough, it was this Arab landowners families in Jerusalem who sold land to the Jewish National Fund.
According
to the Peel Commission report, Arab allegations regarding Jewish land purchase
were unfounded. "Much of the land now carrying orange groves was sand
dunes or swamp and uncultivated when it was purchased...There was at the time
of the earlier sales little evidence that the owners possessed either the
resources or training needed to develop the land."
The
opportunities the Arabs had to create a Palestinian state?
Although
it was against the League of Nations decisions for the Palestine mandate, this Palestinian state could have been
established as early as 1937, if the Arabs had agreed.
But the Arabs said no to a Palestinian state!
The Arab spokesman Auni Bey Abdul Hadi, of the
Palestinian delegation to the London Conference was strongly against the
conclusion of the Peel Commission, and rejected totally the idea of a
Palestinian state
On 29 November
1947 the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution recommending the adoption
and implementation of the UN Partition Plan for Palestine.
The proposed plan was accepted by the leaders of the
Jewish community in Palestine, through the Jewish Agency.
What is interesting here is that the Arab states
rejected the idea of a Palestinian state, and after the war between the Arab
states and Israel in 1948-49, Jordan and Egypt occupied what was left of the
Palestinian Arab state, the West Bank and Gaza.
In 1946, prof. Hitti was the first
Arab-American witness at the Anglo-American
Committee of Inquiry on Palestine.
An American member of the committee,
recalled that Hitti, explained that there was actually no such entity as
Palestine- never had been; it was historically part of Syria, and "the
Sunday schools” have done a great deal of harm to us because by smearing the
walls of classrooms with maps of Palestine.
I will also quote another prominent Arab
politician, Ahmed al Shukariy, a heavyweight in Arab and Palestinian politics
Born in south Lebanon and studying
law in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, he
became a prominent lawyer in British-Palestine and a member of the Syrian delegation
to the United Nations from 1949 to 1951.
He was an assistant Secretary General for the Arab League from 1950–56, Saudi ambassador to the United Nations from 1957 to 1962.
He is an example that Arabs are a distinct people, as he has served in
several Arab countries.
At the 1964 Arab
League summit (Cairo), he was given a mandate to initiate contacts aimed at establishing
a Palestinian entity. In May 1964, he was elected the first Chairman of the
PLO.
In the 1950s, he says the following
about the nation of Palestine:
In the1950s, there was never an attempt to create a Palestinian state,
from any Arab politician. The question was how to destroy Israel.
From 1964 on, the Arab side began to
explore the possibility
of creating a Palestinian national
identity in the West Bank and Gaza
But it was only after the Six Day
War in 1967, that a Palestinian people and a Palestinian state became part of
the Arab agenda.
But the story we are told to day, is
that the Palestinians lost their land “Palestine”.
The Western powers and the UN, gave
it to the Jews in 1947
The truth is that the Arab world have
reincarnated "the nation and people of Palestine" to fight the Jewish heritage of the Land of Israel, and more than 50
Muslim countries are particularly active in the UN to communicate this message.
The strange thing with many UN resolutions is, that over time, they may undergo a
transformation and a rebirth.
Resolutions
that Arab countries have rejected, and tried to bury, has suddenly found new
life in the struggle against Israel.
UN
Resolution 181, "Partition Plan for Palestine,"
was rejected
and strongly condemned by the Arab countries in 1947.
In 1988, the PLO launched a Palestinian independence
declaration,
where they sketched a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza with
Jerusalem as its capital.
The
foundation for this state was strangely enough the UN Resolution 181, which the
Arab Palestinian leadership and the Arab League rejected in 1947.
And the PLO
charter of 1964, strongly condemns.
They claimed
that UN Resolution 181, still gave international legitimacy to a Palestinian
state.
Today, the
majority of UN member states have accepted this understanding of the
resolution, and is working hard to create a Palestinian state.
Let us again look into the past of this country.
When General Alenby conquered Jerusalem
Dec.1917, and later conquered the part of the Ottoman Empire, which
became the British mandate of Palestine, this land had been
ruled by the Turkish Ottomans for four hundred years.
It was a thinly populated country, where the rural population for the most parts were Bedouins. In the towns and villages, the population consisted of different religions and nationalities. Most were Muslim and Christian Arabs, but there were also many Jews, Druz, Armenians, Circassian from the Caucasus etc. so the people in the area could hardly be called a nation.
It was a thinly populated country, where the rural population for the most parts were Bedouins. In the towns and villages, the population consisted of different religions and nationalities. Most were Muslim and Christian Arabs, but there were also many Jews, Druz, Armenians, Circassian from the Caucasus etc. so the people in the area could hardly be called a nation.
Today Arabic influences has led the United Nations and the
world community to accept a Palestinian people who have lost their land.
In particular, they
have used the Palestinian refugees' situation in the Middle East refugee camps,
to promote the Palestinian cause.
But from the Palestinian
authorities (PA) the people in the refugee camps in the West Bank and Gaza,
will continue to be refugees, as long as they can’t be resettled in Israel.
The Palestinian refugee problem was created by
the Arab states in 1948
Five Arab nations launched a
war in 1948 to remove the tiny Jewish state, and the
Arab states are responsible for the Palestinian refugee problem.
The Palestinians, who fled to Gaza and the West Bank, were placed in refugee camps without citizenship in their own country, in the area the UN had intended to become an Arab Palestinian State.
The Palestinians, who fled to Gaza and the West Bank, were placed in refugee camps without citizenship in their own country, in the area the UN had intended to become an Arab Palestinian State.
The
Arab countries' treatment of the Palestinian
refugees should really be considered a criminal act.
While the rest of the
world's refugees is placed under the UN High Commissioner, the Palestinian
refugees have their own refugee organization UNRWA, that arose out of the
pressure from the Arab states, and received support by Folke Bernadotte, the
United Nations Security Council mediator in the Arab–Israeli conflict of 1947–1948.
UNRWA have completely
different rules than all the refugees under the UN High Commissioner. The
Palestinian refugees will be refugees forever if they can't be resettled in
Israel
(Palestinian
refugees and the UNRWA organization.)
Yasser
Arafat used to call himself: “a palestinian refugee
The problem with the
Arab population living in areas that were intended for the
Jews could
easily been solved with a little Arab cooperation.
In the
1923 population exchange between Greece and Turkey
500,000
Muslims in Greece, and 900,000 Orthodox Christians (including 50,000 Armenians)
from Turkey was exchanged.
And some
millions Hindus and Muslims were exchanged between India and Pakistan in 1949,
with acceptance from the Muslim states in the UN.
Approximately 700,000 Palestinian Arabs chose
to flee the fighting in1948-49.
At the same time 850,000 Jews chose to leave
the Arab countries
because of Arab hostility
and massacres. 600,000 of
them fled to Israel.
These Arab Jews must
also be included in the refugee list.
Let's do a little summary of the
international community's efforts to create a Palestinian state:
In 1922, the
English government laid the foundation for
a Palestinian Arab state, Jordan.
In 1937, the Peel Commission attempted to form a Palestinian arab state west of the Jordan River, which was rejected by the Arabs
In 1937, the Peel Commission attempted to form a Palestinian arab state west of the Jordan River, which was rejected by the Arabs
in 1947, the international community tried
to create a the second Palestinian Arab state in the same
area, which was rejected and destroyed by the Arab countries.
In 2000, President Clinton invited Arafat and the Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, to negotiations in Camp David,
in an attempt
to create a Palestinian state on the West Bank and Gaza. They
could actually obtained a large state in this area in 1947, if they had not
rejected the offer.
Barak was
willing to cede 95% of the West Bank and 100% of Gaza
to establish a Palestinian state.
The
Palestinians could have had this state by now,
but Arafat said no!
and according to his wife Suha, he started the intifada. His suicide bombers killed and maimed a large numbers of Israelis.
but Arafat said no!
and according to his wife Suha, he started the intifada. His suicide bombers killed and maimed a large numbers of Israelis.
Arafat was the modern
godfather of terrorism, with airplane hijackings, car bombs and killing of
civilians. Today, we have to go through a security check at every airport, because
of Arafat.
And imagine, the
Norwegian Nobel Committee gave him the peace prize, immediately after the Oslo
agreement, without any sign of peace so far in the area.
Through the Oslo
accord, Arafat got transferred 40,000 terrorists from Tunis to the West Bank
and Gaza, terrorists from Fatah, Islamic Jihad and Hamas
In retrospect, it has
been proven through the intifada he started after Camp David negotiations, that
he had no intention of making peace with Israel.
But if Arafat had any
thoughts of peace with Israel, he would quickly become regarded as a traitor by
the majority of the Muslim countries, and would have had the same fate as
President Sadat of Egypt, who was assassinated in 1981.
And why should the international community constantly keep on
with this dance around the negotiating table, to create yet another Arab state?
Today, the Arabs have
21 states, and the truth is that the
Palestinian Arabs already have a country.
Jordan is Palestine, said king
Hussein of Jordan.
But the truth also is, that
if the Palestinian leadership and the Muslim world accept Jordan as
a Palestinian state, then it will be difficult for the
Muslim world to fight on to eliminate Israel.
So the creation of a Palestinian national
identity is only a pretext to continue the
struggle against Israel.
It's nice when people tell the truth, like Zuheir Moshen do.
The Palestinian sense of
identity is not very strong, according to him
This lack of Palestinian identity is made highly visible by the Hamas minister of the interior and of national security, Fathi Haamad
He
appeared on Egyptian television March 23. 2012, and spoke clearly that
large numbers of the Palestinian people had immigrated from Egypt and other
Arab countries, and this consciousness was still strong among
Palestinians.
Link to this video
Recommend to watch this video
What unites the people of the Middle East, is an
Arab identity, and perhaps even more, a Muslim
identity
The conflict in the Middle
East is mainly a religious conflict. This is not
difficult to recognize when you see the
commitment from the entire Muslim world,
and Hamas openly acknowledge this in their charter
and Hamas openly acknowledge this in their charter
The Muslim world is trying
to deny Israel's historical connection to
Jerusalem and Palestine.
Arafat claimed during the Camp David
negotiations, that it never ever had been a Jewish temple
on the Temple Mount.But recently we have seen that they do not just try to deny the Jewish connection to the
land, but that
they even try to usurp the Jewish religion as
well,
In this
video Dr. Omar Jaara at the University of Nabulus
says, that
Moses led the Muslims out of Egypt, and started the first fight for a Palestinian homeland.
Moses led the Muslims out of Egypt, and started the first fight for a Palestinian homeland.
See video link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqjwLKdg9ro
If there was ever any doubt about
the Palestinians' intentions, there won't be after you watch this video. Peace
was never their end game. Talk of peace was their means to an end. An end to
Israel. https://www.facebook.com/TheIsraelNetwork/videos/547528165408498/
Today, Arabs from the Middle East flows into Europe,
and although they are a minority population in Europe
today, they demand that their culture should also apply to us Europeans.
From the time of Mohammed, Muslims have conquered
other people's land.
The Libyan Colonel Gaddafi strongly believed that the
Muslim world would conquer Europe
We have 50 million
Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in
Europe—without swords, without guns, without conquest—will turn it into a
Muslim continent within a few decades.
And Muslims in Britain,
will make Bucingham palac into a mosque
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9fC-3Z6oD4
And Muslims in Britain,
will make Bucingham palac into a mosque
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9fC-3Z6oD4
But when the
Jews have become the majority in a small
area in the Middle East, the Muslim countries become very upset and appalled:
That Jews
have gradually invaded the country and have become a majority population in the
state of Israel,
to the Muslim world,
with its double standard, this is totally unacceptable, and is portrayed as a
criminal offense.